Keywords
Satisfação
Usabilidade
Cultura organizacional
UTAUT.
How to Cite
Abstract
As pesquisas relacionadas à adoção de tecnologias da informação são importantes, pois podem verificar o impacto do uso e da satisfação da tecnologia adotada em uma organização, como o modelo de aceitação de tecnologia UTAUT (Teoria Unificada de Aceitação e Uso da Tecnologia). Desta forma, este estudo tem como objetivo analisar a relação entre a usabilidade do sistema e a cultura organizacional na satisfação de uso do sistema pelos usuários de uma empresa do setor metalomecânico de Caxias do Sul-RS. Para tal, foi realizada uma pesquisa do tipo survey, com 100 funcionários de uma empresa do setor referido. Os resultados mostraram que 58,2% da satisfação de uso do sistema pelos usuários é explicada pela usabilidade do sistema e a cultura organizacional. Portanto, as empresas deverão investir em sistemas adaptativos para que eles possam se moldarem às características dos usuários, satisfazendo-os. De forma complementar, a cultura organizacional deve estar voltada às adoções de novas tecnologias para que haja maior adesão por parte dos usuários.References
Alcivar, I., & Abad, A. G. (2016). Design and evaluation of a gamified system for ERP training. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 58, n.1, p. 109-118.
Ali, F., Nair, P. K., & Hussain, K. (2016). An assessment of students' acceptance and usage of computer supported collaborative classrooms in hospitality and tourism schools. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, v. 18, n.1, p. 51-60.
Alharbi, S. (2017). An extended UTAUT model for understanding of the effect of trust on users' acceptance of cloud computing. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, v. 56, n. 1, p. 65-76.
Alrashed, T. et al. (2015). An observational study of usability in collaborative tangible interfaces for complex planning systems. Procedia Manufacturing, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1974-1980.
Alwahaishi, S., & Snásel, V. (2013). Acceptance and use of information and communications technology: a UTAUT and flow based theoretical model. Journal of technology management & innovation, v. 8, n. 2, p. 61-73.
Barrera-León, L. et al. (2016). Tukuchiy: a dynamic user interface generator to improve usability. International Journal of Web Information Systems, v. 12, n. 2, p. 150-176.
Beltrame, M., & Maçada, A. (2009). Validação de um Instrumento para medir o Valor da Tecnologia da Informação (TI) para as organizações. Organizações em contexto, v. 5, n. 9, p. 1-23.
Celik, H. (2016). Customer on-line shopping anxiety within the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use Technology (UTAUT) framework. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, v. 28, n. 2, p. 278-307.
Cilliers, L., & Flowerday, S. (2017). Factors that influence the usability of a participatory IVR crowdsourcing system in a smart city. South African Computer Journal, v. 29, n. 3, p. 16-30.
Costa, C. J. et al. (2016). Enterprise resource planning adoption and satisfaction determinants. Computers In Human Behavior, v. 63, n. 1, p. 659-671.
Eisend, M., Evanschitzky, H, & Gilliland, D. I. (2016). The influence of organizational and national culture on new product performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 33, n. 3, p. 260-276.
Fávero, L. P. et al. (2009). Análise de dados: modelagem multivariada para tomada de decisões. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
Foucreault, A., Ollier-Malaterre, A., & Ménard, J. (2018). Organizational culture and work–life integration: A barrier to employees’ respite? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, v. 29, n. 16, p. 2378-2398.
Gopalakrishnan, S., & Zhan, H. (2017). Client dependence and vendor innovation: The moderating role of organizational culture. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 66, n. 1, p. 80-89.
Garg, P., & Khurana, R. (2017). Applying structural equation model to study the critical risks in ERP implementation in Indian retail. Benchmarking: An International Journal, v. 24, n. 1, p. 143-162.
Hair Jr., J. F. et al. (2005). Fundamentos de métodos de pesquisa em administração. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Hair Jr., J. F. et al. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. 6. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Han, C.-K., Lee, S.-K., & You, Y.-Y. (2016). The Effect of Intension to use Biometric-based Non-Face-to-Face Authentication System in Financial Transactions-Focusing on Extended UTAUT Model. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, v. 9, n. 40, p. 1-13.
Kabra, G. et al. (2017). Understanding behavioural intention to use information technology: Insights from humanitarian practitioners. Telematics and Informatics, v. 34, n. 7, p. 1250-1261.
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4. ed. New York – NY: Guilford Press.
Laurenza, E. et al. (2018). O efeito da adoção de tecnologias digitais no setor de saúde: uma análise baseada em casos. Business Process Management Journal, v. 24, n. 5, p. 1124-1144.
Maculan, B. C. M. dos S. et al. (2011). Uso de gerenciador de conteúdos e hipertextos: gestão na biblioteca universitária The use management of contents and hypertext: management in university libraries. Revista ACB, v. 16, n. 1, p. 269-288.
Mann, H. et al. (2017). Providing custom enterprise resource planning solutions: benefits and challenges. International Journal of Information Technology and Management, v. 16, n. 2, p. 147-161.
McGlinn, K. et al. (2017). Usability evaluation of a web-based tool for supporting holistic building energy management. Automation in Construction, v. 84, n. 1, p. 154-165.
Min, Q., Ji, S., & Qu, G. (2008). Mobile commerce user acceptance study in China: a revised UTAUT model. Tsinghua Science and Technology, v. 13, n. 3, p. 257-264.
Nagpal, S., Kumar, A., & Khatri, S. K. (2017). Modeling interrelationships between CSF in ERP implementations: total ISM and MICMAC approach. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, v. 8, n. 4, p. 782-798.
Nielsen, J. (2012). How many test users in a usability study. Nielsen Norman Group, v. 4, n. 06, 2012.
Okumus, B. et al. (2018). Psychological factors influencing customers’ acceptance of smartphone diet apps when ordering food at restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, v. 72, n. 1, p. 67-77.
Petrick, I., Maitland, C., & Pogrebnyakov, N. (2016). Unpacking coordination benefits in supply networks: findings from manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, v. 54, n. 2, p. 582-597.
Polychroniou, P., Trivellas, P. (2018). The impact of strong and balanced organizational cultures on firm performance: Assessing moderated effects. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, v. 10, n. 1, p. 16-35.
Klimas, P. (2016). Organizational culture and coopetition: An exploratory study of the features, models and role in the Polish Aviation Industry. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 53, n. 1, p. 91-102.
Kuo, T., & Tsai, G. Y. (2019). The effects of employee perceived organisational culture on performance: the moderating effects of management maturity. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, v. 30, n. 3-4, p. 267-283.
Rahi, S. (2017). Research design and methods: A systematic review of research paradigms, sampling issues and instruments development. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, v. 6, n. 2, p. 1-5.
Rahi, S. et al. (2018). Investigating the role of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in internet banking adoption context. Management Science Letters, v. 8, n. 3, p. 173-186.
Rogers, M. E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations, 5. ed. New York: Free press.
Raharjo, K. et al. (2018). The influence of organizational culture and job design on job commitment and human resource performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, v. 31, n. 7, p. 1346-1367.
Sarabadani, J., Jafarzadeh, H., & Shamizanjani, M. (2017). Towards Understanding the Determinants of Employees' E-Learning Adoption in Workplace: A Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) View. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, v. 13, n. 1, p. 38-49.
Sepasgozar, S. et al. (2018). An investigation of modern building equipment technology adoption in the Australian construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, v. 25, n. 8, p. 1075-1091.
Shafiq, M., Ahmad, M., & Choi, J.-G. (2017). Public system usability analysis for the valuation of cognitive burden and interface standardization: A case study of cross-ATM design. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, v. 27, n. 2, p. 162-196.
SIMECS. (2020). Sindicato das Indústrias Metalúrgicas, Mecânicas e de Material Elétrico de Caxias do Sul. Disponível em: www.simecs.com.br. Acesso em: 23 jan. 2020.
Souza, C. A. de, & Saccol, A. Z. (org.). (2011). Sistemas ERP no Brasil. São Paulo: Atlas.
Suárez, P., Silva, Y., & Souza, S. (2011). Sistemas de Apoio À Decisão para a Adoção de Tecnologia de Informação – a Construção de um Protótipo. In: SIMPÓSIO DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO E TECNOLOGIA, 8., 2011, Resende. Anais [...]. Resende: Associação Educacional Dom Bosco.
Tak, P., & Panwar, S. (2017). Using/ UTAUT 2 model to predict mobile app based shopping: evidences from India. Journal of Indian Business Research, v. 9, n. 3, p. 248-264.
Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why Don’t Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior. MIS Quarterly, v. 24, n. 1, p. 115-139.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., Dsvis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Mis Quarterly, v. 27, n. 3, p. 425-478.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, p. 157-178.
Wei, Y., & Miraglia, S. (2017). Organizational culture and knowledge transfer in project-based organizations: Theoretical insights from a Chinese construction firm. International Journal of Project Management, v. 35, n. 4, p. 571-585.
Zare Ravasan, A., & Mansouri, T. (2016). A dynamic ERP critical failure factors modelling with FCM throughout project lifecycle phases. Production Planning & Control, v. 27, n. 2, p. 65-82.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.